<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fun: Windows vs. Linux for toasters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dafin</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-12096</link>
		<dc:creator>Dafin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-12096</guid>
		<description>somewhat amusing haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>somewhat amusing haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-3395</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-3395</guid>
		<description>... and the hilarity ensues :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and the hilarity ensues <img src='http://www.linuxscrew.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artiomix</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-3152</link>
		<dc:creator>artiomix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-3152</guid>
		<description>Thank you, ed wiget =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, ed wiget =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed wiget</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-3151</link>
		<dc:creator>ed wiget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-3151</guid>
		<description>a forum post about it here and linked back to this page - http://www.maysville-linux-users-group.org/ftopicp-467.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a forum post about it here and linked back to this page - <a href="http://www.maysville-linux-users-group.org/ftopicp-467.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.maysville-linux-users-group.org/ftopicp-467.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Embedded</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2991</link>
		<dc:creator>Embedded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2991</guid>
		<description>Hey don't laugh I "ACTUALLY MADE" a uClinux powered toaster on a 68328 Motorola Dragonball we were looking for "darkness" and had a settable web interface.  However the Snapgear uClinux distro 2.4.32.uC0 Freescale m5235bcc Coldfire with A/D and PWM's would have a much better result since one can run the /bin/toast application 15X faster.

Contact me if you want a uClinux powered appliance! I promise it would be the cheapest embedded micro for the job.

look at www.uclinux.org

j m jeffers at gmail dot "you know"

Houston Texas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey don&#8217;t laugh I &#8220;ACTUALLY MADE&#8221; a uClinux powered toaster on a 68328 Motorola Dragonball we were looking for &#8220;darkness&#8221; and had a settable web interface.  However the Snapgear uClinux distro 2.4.32.uC0 Freescale m5235bcc Coldfire with A/D and PWM&#8217;s would have a much better result since one can run the /bin/toast application 15X faster.</p>
<p>Contact me if you want a uClinux powered appliance! I promise it would be the cheapest embedded micro for the job.</p>
<p>look at <a href="http://www.uclinux.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.uclinux.org</a></p>
<p>j m jeffers at gmail dot &#8220;you know&#8221;</p>
<p>Houston Texas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2990</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2990</guid>
		<description>Hey, that looks incredibly a lot like that BSD toaster, in fact, IT IS!!!! I work for the damn company that made it.  Retards, way to not give credit and way to make a crappy article.  The past two times I have been to this site from stuble, have left me pissed off and sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that looks incredibly a lot like that BSD toaster, in fact, IT IS!!!! I work for the damn company that made it.  Retards, way to not give credit and way to make a crappy article.  The past two times I have been to this site from stuble, have left me pissed off and sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2949</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2949</guid>
		<description>I know. :)
By the way, I'd never buy a Microsoft voluntary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know. <img src='http://www.linuxscrew.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
By the way, I&#8217;d never buy a Microsoft voluntary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lachlan</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2948</link>
		<dc:creator>Lachlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2948</guid>
		<description>@tim

its a parody review. who is going to spend money on regertering a domain name for nothing?

just dont go out and try to buy windows VTT because i can garantee some very strange faces</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@tim</p>
<p>its a parody review. who is going to spend money on regertering a domain name for nothing?</p>
<p>just dont go out and try to buy windows VTT because i can garantee some very strange faces</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2943</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 00:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2943</guid>
		<description>The page heatu.com does not exist. Have you misspelled it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The page heatu.com does not exist. Have you misspelled it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allysource.com</title>
		<link>http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2941</link>
		<dc:creator>allysource.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linuxscrew.com/2008/01/18/fun-windows-vs-linux-for-toasters/#comment-2941</guid>
		<description>that's point less</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s point less</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.490 seconds -->
